Categories
Asides

Infrastructure That Makes Corporate Trust Irrelevant by Making Lies Impossible

Every time a “fabrication of inspection data” scandal surfaces in the manufacturing world, I can’t help but think—it’s not just about one company’s wrongdoing. It’s a structural issue embedded in society itself.

We operate in systems where lying becomes necessary. In fact, the system often rewards dishonesty. As long as this remains true, we shouldn’t view misconduct as a matter of individual or corporate ethics—but as a systemic design flaw.

That’s exactly why, when a technology appears that makes lying technically impossible, we should adopt it without hesitation.

Why can large corporations charge higher prices and still sell their products? Because they’ve earned trust over time. Their price tags are justified not just by quality and performance, but by accumulated history—reputation, consistency, and customer confidence.

But once that trust is broken, price advantages crumble quickly. Worse, the damage ripples through the entire supply chain. The longer the history, the broader the impact.

Startups, on the other hand, often compete on price. Without a long track record, they offer lower prices and slowly build trust through repeated delivery. That’s been the only way—until now.

Today, things are different. Imagine a startup that records its manufacturing processes and inspection data in real time, using an immutable system that prevents tampering. That alone is enough to objectively prove that their data—and by extension, their product—is authentic.

In other words, trust is no longer a function of time. We’re shifting from trust built over decades to trust guaranteed by infrastructure.

So for startups entering the manufacturing space, here’s what I believe they should keep in mind from day one:

Leave a tamper-proof audit trail for all quality and inspection data.
That record becomes a competitive weapon the moment a legacy competitor is caught in a data scandal.
The value of that audit trail grows over time, so it’s critical to start now—not later.
Use data to visualize trust, and build competitive advantage beyond price.
It’s an asset that can’t be recreated retroactively.

For large enterprises that already enjoy the benefits of trust, this shift isn’t someone else’s problem. It’s happening now.

Your ability to charge premium prices is built on the trust you’ve accumulated—but that trust can vanish with a single scandal. The older the company, the greater the surface area for reputational risk. And the more complex the supply chain, the faster that risk spreads.

What we need now is an environment where dishonesty is structurally impossible.
Real-time auditing of inspection data.
End-to-end transparency across the supply chain.
With that infrastructure in place, even if a problem does occur, it can be detected early and contained before it spreads.

This isn’t just risk mitigation—it’s a form of psychological safety for the people on the ground. If they don’t have to lie, they can focus on doing honest work. If mistakes happen, they can report them. And if they’re reported, they can be fixed.

In short, this isn’t a system to prevent fraud—it’s a system to cultivate trust.

With such a system, a company can prove it hasn’t cheated. And society will begin to evaluate who to work with based on those records. In a world where data is an asset, an immutable audit trail is the ultimate proof of integrity.

But here’s the thing: you can only start building that record now. Not tomorrow.

An audit trail means you never had to lie in the first place. It’s a record of your honesty—and a source of competitive strength for the future.

Categories
Asides

The Concept of Distributed National Infrastructure

Until now, national infrastructure was something centrally managed and deployed across an entire country. Power plants, communication networks, water systems, roads, and data centers—all followed a model of “build in one place, use everywhere.” It was the nation that built, protected, and supplied these systems.

But that structure is slowly starting to change.

As portions of information infrastructure and computational resources come to be operated by specific tech giants, the infrastructure that once sat beneath the authority of the state is beginning to form a structure parallel to it. And what’s coming next is a shift away from centralization—toward a physical and logical model of “distribution.”

Distribution doesn’t simply mean breaking things into smaller parts. It means separating locations, ownership, control rights, power sources, and networks. It means running each independently, while allowing them to function together as a single system. That, to me, is the core of what “distributed national infrastructure” means.

This kind of structure is often discussed in terms of redundancy in disasters or risk dispersion in geopolitics. But more importantly, I believe it becomes critical when we begin asking, “Under whose sovereignty does this infrastructure operate?”

Entities not belonging to any central authority, but possessing social functions equal to or greater than national infrastructure. Cloud services, blockchain networks, local compute clusters, off-grid energy systems—when combined, these create a new kind of infrastructure that transcends borders and legal systems.

Whether this becomes something that replaces the nation-state, or something that complements it, remains to be seen. But what’s clear is that infrastructure is no longer something exclusive to states.

Perhaps we are entering an era where infrastructure is not something built by the state, but something into which the state must now merge—beyond the constraints of geography and the linear flow of time.

Categories
Asides

Blockchain Oriented Business Management

I receive many requests from companies who seek advice on how to use the Blockchain, but I believe there is something that must be done even before using the Blockchain technology.
That is to manage their business like the Blockchain.

Categories
Asides

"Social Evaluation" will become everything

I live in an Airbnb.
If you ask me why, it’s because I’m certain that an era of a new sense of value will begin. It’s the era where “Social Evaluation” will become everything.

Categories
Asides

Since it's 2018, these are the things I've decided to stop doing

I want to live in a world I can believe in

The picture you see is a New Year’s gift I gave this year. I didn’t want to receive these young people, who still have their entire futures ahead of them, so I gave them a gift using a currency I could believe in. I was told last year to stop putting these strange ideas into their heads, but this year, it went so smoothly I could hardly believe it. I also took the chance to explain to them how to use and manage their gift.
And now, it’s 2018. The future is practically now. So, I’d like to announce a few, not quite new year’s resolutions, but things I’ve decided I really have to stop doing, as an expression of my determination.

Categories
Asides

Beyond the startup

I went to CERN


I visited CERN. I’m going to make an announcement later, but I made an official appointment before visiting.
I remember it even now. It was a special TV program about the Internet revolution that I had once seen while I was a child. It was an episode about Tim Berners-Lee giving birth to the WWW at CERN, and Andreessen developing Mosaic. The Internet nowadays has all started from the WWW.
And I went to the birthplace of the WWW.

Categories
Asides

The decentralization of society

What is the decentralization of society?

Our world today is becoming more and more decentralized.
Decentralization refers to the breaking up of a completely isolated and individual system into smaller and more efficient organizations or communities. Multiple finely divided communities would exist from the standpoint of one individual human being, communities can also be physically separated. The kind of societal structure we are currently heading towards is a system depicted by the cryptocurrency.

Categories
Asides

Mom's ICO

The era of Moms doing ICOs has arrived

When I attended a consensus in this year, I was approached by a woman around my parents’ age who said, “I am going to do an ICO.” Just in case anyone doubts me here, this really is a true story.
After that happened, as I was thinking “the day when mothers are doing ICOs must be quite soon,” after returning to Japan I quickly began talking in various places about how “when mothers start talking about doing their own ICOs, it might be time to be careful.”
That has become a reality faster than I thought it would. It has truly become the era when moms come to ask for advice regarding ICOs. If your mother came to your place and asked for advice, you must give advice so that she does not conduct fraud without intending to do so.

Exit mobile version